MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

BYOFall

red leaf

Be Sociable, Share!

70 Responses to “BYOFall”

  1. Triple Option says:

    Well, now that it’s officially fall, I’ll state that my two best films I saw over the summer were The Peanut Butter Falcon and Ready or Not.

    Pretty much everything else was a disappointment, to varying degrees. Actually, Toy Story IV wasn’t too bad but the world is no better from it having been made.

  2. Stella's Boy says:

    Saw Downtown Abbey last night. Wasn’t something I expected to see but life’s full of surprises. I only saw a handful of episodes in their entirety and bits & pieces of others. The movie is fine. I wasn’t bored. Cast is good. Production and costume design very handsome. But what’s striking to me, and it’s not surprising as he is an old wealthy white male and a Tory if I’m not mistaken, is how much Julian Fellowes reveres the Royals and the rich family.

    I saw something bizarre beforehand. A trailer for something Bruce Springsteen related. No offense to fans of The Boss (I’m pretty indifferent about him and his music), but it’s one of the most mindbogglingly weird and awful things I’ve ever seen in a movie theater. His voiceover is something a college sophomore philosophy major would find deep and profound. It’s shot to make him look like some rugged, introspective, soulful, cowboy poet. But it’s so over-the-top and strained it’s beyond comical. Just so astoundingly bad.

    Tomorrow is Shocktober. Best month of the year.

  3. Christian says:

    Anyone heading to the Virginia Film Festival in October? I’m thinking I’ll stay Thursday through Sunday with a friend, but I’m game for a meet-up with anyone here if you’re making plans.

    https://virginiafilmfestival.org/schedule/

    I’ll have to miss this year’s Middleburg Film Festival, the schedule for which should be announced tomorrow.

    https://middleburgfilm.org

  4. movieman says:

    Are you referring to “Western Stars,” SB?
    WB picked that up and are planning a release for late October.
    It’s Springsteen’s directing debut.
    Supposed to be pretty good, but it doesn’t sound appreciably different than his B’way show that I still haven’t gotten around to watching on Netflix.

  5. Stella's Boy says:

    Yes that’s it. There are vanity projects and then there’s this. A whole other level. Never seen anything like it.

  6. Pete B. says:

    Sweet Jesus Stella, just saw the trailer and you weren’t kidding. Hopefully Johnny Cash’s ghost shows up to kick Bruce’s ass and take away the black cowboy hat.

  7. Stella's Boy says:

    Ok good glad I wasn’t overreacting. I spent those two minutes just completely dumbfounded by what I was watching.

  8. MarkVH80 says:

    Western Stars got raves at TIFF, so maybe it’s just a bad trailer. Regardless, it’s one of Bruce’s best records in many years, so I’m looking forward to catching the film.

  9. palmtree says:

    I’ve been waiting for this for a while…a movie that’s actually way better than the trailer!

  10. Eric says:

    The Western Stars trailer: https://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/western-stars/

    I love Springsteen but yeah the voiceover is just bafflingly stupid. The overall package is not helped by the cowboy motif which has never fit Springsteen well– it just feels like a pose.

    Sometimes your heroes just make some junk and all you can do is hope they do better next time.

  11. SideshowBill says:

    I’m with Stella. Shocktober! I need to compile a list of new stuff to check out along the usual stuff. Luz, Bliss, Byzantium, May The Devil Take You, so so so many I haven’t seen. Also a great month for reading.

  12. Stella's Boy says:

    That’s right Todd Phillips it is literally impossible to make an irreverent comedy now because of “woke culture.” Jesus he’s a fucking idiot.

  13. leahnz says:

    YOU IN DANGER, GIRL!

    (you know what todd really means, stella’s)

  14. palmtree says:

    New Republic had a great article about how “cancel culture” is actually not threatening to anyone except people who are pushing mediocre jokes that audiences are rejecting because of their mediocrity. Supposedly liberal people need to stop agreeing with this stupid narrative that only further emboldens the right.

    https://newrepublic.com/article/155141/cancel-culture-con-dave-chappelle-shane-gillis

  15. Pete B. says:

    “you know what todd really means…”

    That ‘Woke Culture’ provides it’s own comedy?

    https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/urinals-banned-portland-building/283-74b0d059-0d32-465f-804a-c3f8dacebd28

  16. Stella's Boy says:

    That’s a really good piece palmtree. I also like the Carlin interview from 1990 that’s making the rounds. Never saw that before. Yes I think we all know what crybaby dipshit Todd really means leah. Our culture just can’t handle his irreverent comedies! Woke culture is code for “People get upset now when I’m racist or homophobic or misogynist and it’s not fair.”

  17. SideshowBill says:

    Here’s what I know: I found Booksmart to be funnier than any Todd Phillips movie. Good Boys also had vulgar comedy without being offensive and it even had some real empathy. Hell, I thought the Child’s Play remake was a fun comedy.

    Seth Rogan and his guys aren’t always successful but every now and then he hits at least a triple with Sausage Party and The Night Before.

    Phillips misunderstands comedy. A lot. I’ve liked a few of his movies but most have been dead fish for me.

  18. amblinman says:

    There is no such thing as political correctness. Or more to the point society has *constantly* been shifting in terms of what it finds funny and/or acceptable. Like, were audiences “woke” when they stopped finding black face funny?

    In addition it’s so funny watching these hollowed out Bill HIcksbots whine that they’re no longer “allowed” to be rebels. There’s a reason the phrase is “It STRUCK me as funny”, guys. If no one finds you funny, then yes, the culture has moved on. Maybe you should too.

  19. Christian says:

    Not that my previous post got any response, but just in case someone here is interested, the Middleburg Film Festival has now posted its lineup. There’s a lot of overlap with the Virginia Film Festival. The prime difference that leapt out to me is Middleburg’s screening of “The Irishman”:

    https://middleburgfilm.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/mff2019_schedule_6_1.jpg

  20. Hcat says:

    “Supposedly liberal people need to stop agreeing with this stupid narrative that only further emboldens the right.”

    Fully agree, I have not seen a single instance of someone getting ‘canceled’ for telling a funny joke. It always amazes me when comedians complain about the very behavior they exhibit.

  21. leahnz says:

    in addition to everything else there’s just a mean-spiritedness to most of todd’s ‘comedy’, a casual callous heart of coal that’s insidiously repellent — and not “irreverent” like he seems to think, rather the cliche punch-down comedy a sadist enjoys, cruelomedy. dickomedy. ‘booksmart’ is irreverent. todd (even the name annoys me, like one of those trading places guys) is a cliche who’s made precisely one slick, fairly decent movie and it’s because he didn’t write it (that includes ‘joker’ – who knew such a try-hard ‘disturbing’ rip-off of others with actual vision could be such a nicely-photographed bore. sad trombone. w/out joaquin’s chops it’d be laughable (ba dum tsss)

    (somebody’s gotta live near this middleburg place to hit christian up for some flicks)

  22. Triple Option says:

    SideshowBill wrote:

    Here’s what I know: I found Booksmart to be funnier than any Todd Phillips movie.”

    Wow, we are on opposite ends on that! I also don’t like horror, which I know you love, so there’s that but it’s been maybe 5 years or more since I last saw Old School and can think of 5-6 parts, not even full scenes but parts of scenes where I laughed harder and longer than all of Booksmart combined. Heck, it’s only 3 months since I’ve seen Booksmart and I’m struggling to think of 5-6 points I laughed at all, not merely a chuckle.

  23. movieman says:

    Who else has seen this?

    https://youtu.be/Ify9S7hj480

    I’m thinking this could be Guy Ritchie’s best since “RocknRolla.”
    Such a blast seeing Hugh Grant Ritchie-it-up.
    Wish it was opening tomorrow!

  24. Stella's Boy says:

    Booksmart is a much, much better movie than Old School. I found Old School amusing as a 20-year-old, but it doesn’t hold up well. It still has some laughs but isn’t nearly as funny as Booksmart. Phillips makes movies for young males. They are far from comedy classics. He seems like a small, bitter, angry man who hasn’t gotten over Hangover III being rejected.

    Not a huge Ritche fan, but holy shit The Gentlemen has one hell of a cast. For some reason that movie wasn’t on my radar at all. It looks like it could be a lot of fun. Hugh Grant looks fantastic. Barely even recognized Colin Farrell.

  25. Hcat says:

    “not even full scenes but parts of scenes where I laughed”

    I don’t remember Old School even having full scenes so it would make sense that you only remember snippets. OS was very good at hitting a funny image or idea (smoking on the rings, lone streaking, earmuffs, even just Hank washing his car in short shorts) but it certainly didn’t make a cohesive film. Phillips got better at crafting a movie (Due Date is probably my favorite) but even his more dramatic-based on true events War Dogs plays like it was filtered through his bro comedy sensibility.

    Its funny that we are also talking Ritchie since he would have been perfect for War Dogs. While their films are all very butch there does seem to be a distinct difference in sensibility in the films. Does Ritchie feel less affection for the guys crashing about? Or is it that Ritchie makes films about alpha males while Phillips makes films about betas?

    And I have an aversion to McConahghey, and Hunnan has yet to really wow me, though these are the right hands for them to be in. But the rest of the cast is mouthwatering, Eddie Marsen never fails to bring a smile to my face, even though his is only in the trailer for a fraction of a second.

  26. SideshowBill says:

    Triple Option, disagreement is fine. I embrace the glowing rainbow of opinions in this world, unless you’re a Nazi, a rapist or a Trump supporter. And jam bands. Fucking hate jam bands.

  27. Triple Option says:

    Was Toto a jam band?

  28. Stella's Boy says:

    Richard Jewell trailer is interesting. Great cast. I have vague memories of all that but nothing more. Hope it’s better than The Mule.

  29. movieman says:

    SB- Not the biggest Ritchie fan either.
    “RocknRolla” is the only Ritchie I flat-out love, and some of his films (e.g., that “King Arthur” thing-y and “Revolver”) are truly abysmal.
    But this looks like a blast, and the cast is an embarrassment of riches.
    Love Hunnam, Hcat, and McConaughey is fine in the hands of the right director.

    Not the greatest Phillips booster either, truth be told.
    I mildly liked “Road Trip,” “Old School” and “Due Date” at the time, but hated the “Hangover” movies which are paeans to toxic masculinity.
    “War Dogs” was really underrated, though.
    Remember thinking it was terrific in a David O. Russell pastiche (esp. “American Hustle”) sort of way at the time, not that I’ve revisited it or anything.

    P.S.= Yeah, “Jewell” looks like Clint in his Oscar wheelhouse mode. Love the cast, too, SB.

  30. Stella's Boy says:

    I agree it looks fun and I’d see basically anything with that class. Also a huge Marsan fan. Strong is great on Succession. Michelle Dockery is great. Grant and Farrell have been doing stellar work lately. Good times.

    It does look like Clint in his wheelhouse. Fingers crossed.

  31. Hcat says:

    MM, I haven’t seen Hunnam in much so without seeing Z, Anarchy or Pappilion I haven’t actively searched him out. I am looking extremely forward to the Kelly Gang movie.

  32. Stella's Boy says:

    I liked him on Undeclared. Or maybe it’s just that I really liked that show.

  33. Hcat says:

    The Jewell film has strong shades of Sully. Heroic act turns to investigation. Very strong cast and could easily see Bates and Rockwell’s roles giving them enough meat to chew on to be in the supporting Oscar discussion. Tensest trailer I have seen in awhile, can’t wait.

    Jewell is played the goofy friend from I, Toyna right?

  34. Stella's Boy says:

    Yes that’s the guy. He’s also good in BlacKkKlansman.

  35. Hcat says:

    Right, he keeps popping up. I love when someone who has been so good on the periphery gets a shot to headline, and in a Clint movie no less. This must have been a dream come true.

  36. leahnz says:

    counter-point:
    ‘war dogs’ is a shitty, uneven and poorly-paced (yet another) scorsese-wannabe waste because todd is a mediocre ‘competent’ writer/director with nothing to really say and no style of his own beyond a cadbury sample tray of the same repetitive gags, themes, cliches and cold hearted nastiness, so he copies actual artists but you can’t copy heart and soul so it’s empty and cold (hill is quite good but not nearly enough to save it)

  37. movieman says:

    I think it’s safe to say that Part 2 of Todd Phillips’ career has been as a clever pastiche artist:

    “War Dogs” skillfully–sorry, Leah–apes D.O. Russell in “American Hustle” mode (w/ a soupçon of Scorsese/”Good Fellas”).
    “Joker” is a damn near pointillist pastiche of early Scorsese (esp. “Taxi Driver” and “King of Comedy”) w/ a smattering of Chris Nolan’s operatic “Dark Knight” urban grandeur.
    Not sure whether there’s any there there beyond clever mimicry.
    His early films seem like more classically auteurist works because they feel closer to his innately comic sensibility.

    No disrespect to Rockwell and Bates, but I’m more excited about Hamm and Wilde in “Jewell.”

  38. Hcat says:

    Read the review of Gemini Man in the Guardian and they touch on a good point. They could have simply hired Jaden Smith and saved themselves the VFX budget and all the headaches of filming Patty Duke style. But it seems like since the de aging effects have been the reason d etre from the conception of the project I guess that would defeat the purpose. Of course if the intention was to tell a compelling story whether it was effects or another human shouldn’t matter.

  39. Christian says:

    My library-sale Blu-ray purchases of movies-I-never-really-loved-but-maybe-just-want-to-see-again continued today with $3 copies of “Killing Them Softly” and “We Own the Night.” These join “Deep Blue Sea” (Harlin), “Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets” and “The Post” (the latter of which is the only great film among these titles) as recent, still unwatched Blus bought at the seasonal library sale(s) near me.

  40. Stella's Boy says:

    Killing Them Softly, We Own the Night, and Deep Blue Sea are all outstanding. Worth every penny. I rewatch all three on a regular basis. That’s a cool sale. Wish my library did that.

  41. MarkVH80 says:

    Martin Scorsese’s comments about Marvel movies are silly and dumb and I don’t particularly care for Marvel movies.

  42. Stella's Boy says:

    And some folks are severely overreacting to his comments.

  43. hcat says:

    His response seemed to actually be pretty polite in my opinion. He basically said they weren’t for him, they were too much like amusement park rides. As he probably wasn’t singing the praises of films like Fantastic Voyage back in the day this seems pretty consistent.

    I would think any filmmaker not currently making (or campaigning for) a comic book movie feels the same way about them.

  44. Amblinman says:

    Scorsese is mostly right. Marvel movies aren’t really movies. There are exceptions but most are shot and play like “special event” TV episodes.

    Joker sucked. It’s ugly. And as I’m watching it, I recalled this Arrested Development bit that best summed it up for me:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmLqs8qkP_Y

    Phoenix is good, I guess, but in service to nothing.

    I’d go onto more detail but the movie isn’t worth it. Ugly art that I’ll be happy to not bother with again. (If any of this sounds even a little interesting let me reassure you it’s mostly boring.)

  45. Movieman says:

    I was mildly disappointed in “Judy.”
    Zellweger is fine, but I couldn’t help comparing it to the inimitable Judy Davis/Tammy Blanchard Garland miniseries from 2001 which bests it on every count.
    The flashbacks to MGM-era teen Judy add nothing and are actually pretty distracting since the actress who plays the young Garland looks absolutely nothing like her. (Same for the unfortunate lass whose task was to impersonate the 1968 Liza Minnelli.)
    Definitely got the sense that the whole thing was shot on the cheap in England
    (including the LA sequences which have absolutely zero LA ambiance).
    As stated previously, Zellweger is terrific and could very well score her second Oscar: a nomination is virtually guaranteed.
    But the movie came up short for me…and I’m pretty much its target audience, lol.

  46. leahnz says:

    “it’s mostly boring”

    yes

  47. Christian says:

    SB: Rewatched DEEP BLUE SEA this afternoon and was reminded of why it’s stuck with me all these years. Say what one will about Harlin as a director – I Metroed into D.C. in high school to see PRISON during my Fangoria days, but was genuinely put off for the first time by a Hollywood blockbuster with the carnage of DIE HARD 2 – but the guy can stage an action sequence, or several of them, can’t he? The movie’s a lot of fun, or at least never boring.

  48. leahnz says:

    never use milk to make an omelette — one tablespoon water per two eggs (thanks deep blue sea! the CG sharks are so abysmally un-lifelike it’s unforgivable but once you get over that – if you can – they’re in the ‘so bad it’s good’ pantheon)

    (this iteration of ‘revenge of the nerds’ we’re living through is super fucking annoying. RESET BUTTON)

  49. Christian says:

    Heh. I had forgotten about the omelet line, although I agree with it 100%. No water either! ☺ Just the eggs (and cheese, veggies, if preferred). But no liquid to “add body.” As L.L. said, “This is a mistake.”

  50. Stella's Boy says:

    I am a big Harlin fan Christian. He used to make really fun movies. Sure Deep Blue Sea is dumb, but it’s a total blast. Many ridiculous and fun moments. Great summer movie. Good times.

    Poor Todd Phillips. Hope he’s allowed to make another movie someday.

  51. amblinman says:

    Judy is so weird to me. It feels llike a movie that should have been made about 20-30 years ago. THe audience for this has to be soooo tiny due to the timeframe for her stardom.

  52. movieman says:

    And yet “Judy” is performing well at the box office, Amblin.
    It’s a pretty safe bet it’ll match if not surpass the sleeper success of Roadside’s “Peanut Butter Falcon.”
    I think it’s a collective nostalgia for Garland among audiences of a certain age (and demographic) more than the film itself which is OK but hardly great.
    My screening companion–who hasn’t seen the Davis/Blanchard Judy mini–was mildly disappointed (he apparently hadn’t read the reviews, and was expecting a cradle-to-the-grave biopic).
    Yet he confessed to shedding tears during Renee’s climactic rendition of “Over the Rainbow.”
    I think a lot of people will respond in similar fashion and help make it one of the leggier fall releases.

    P.S.= As soon as I got home, I put a library hold on a DVD of the 2001 mini to share with my partner. I’m confident he’ll love it as much as I do because it’s the full-scale biopic he mistakenly thought “Judy” was.

  53. Christian says:

    A library hold, MM? Ha! I thought I was the only one here who did that! (I lose track across various forums of who hasn’t gone Full Streaming. I sure haven’t, although our recently purchased Roku TV has us watching/streaming more than ever.)

  54. movieman says:

    Maybe if I invest in a contraption that will make streaming something I don’t have to watch exclusively on my laptop, I’ll be more gung ho about the turning tide, Christian.
    At present, the only thing I’m able to stream onto my television is Netflix.
    Which I barely watch.
    And On Demand stuff, of course.

    “Lucy in the Toilet” is more like it!
    Yikes.
    Bet Searchlight doesn’t take it much farther on the basis of that horrid limited opening.

    Friday
    10/4
    (Estimates)

    1 JOKER (2019)
    Warner Bros.

    4,374 $39,900,000

    — / $9,122
    $39,900,000 / 1

    2 ABOMINABLE
    Universal

    4,248 $2,780,000

    +269.1% / $654
    $28,613,115 / 8

    3 DOWNTON ABBEY
    Focus Features

    3,548 $2,400,000

    +53% / $676
    $68,026,935 / 15

    4 HUSTLERS
    STX Entertainment

    3,030 $1,940,000

    +132.3% / $640
    $86,961,880 / 22

    5 IT: CHAPTER TWO
    Warner Bros. (New Line)

    3,163 $1,430,000

    +175.3% / $452
    $198,280,157 / 29

    6 JUDY
    Roadside Attractions

    1,458 $1,345,000

    +306% / $922
    $5,803,443 / 8

    7 AD ASTRA
    Fox

    2,910 $1,247,000

    +106.3% / $429
    $40,352,768 / 15

    8 RAMBO: LAST BLOOD
    Lionsgate

    2,900 $945,000

    +84% / $326
    $37,218,895 / 15

    9 WAR (2019)
    Yash Raj

    305 $420,000

    +113.2% / $1,377
    $927,290 / 3

    10 MY PEOPLE, MY COUNTRY
    CMC

    70 $270,000

    — / $3,857
    $270,000 / 1

    11 GOOD BOYS
    Universal

    1,006 $240,000

    +158% / $239
    $81,382,620 / 50

    12 ANGEL HAS FALLEN
    Lionsgate

    831 $155,000

    +87.7% / $187
    $67,900,715 / 43

    – THE PEANUT BUTTER FALCON
    Roadside Attractions

    623 $140,000

    +91.9% / $225
    $18,637,929 / 57

    – FAST & FURIOUS PRESENTS: HOBBS & SHAW
    Universal

    682 $140,000

    +198.9% / $205
    $172,699,340 / 64

    – THE LION KING (2019)
    Buena Vista

    1,034 $138,000

    +70.2% / $133
    $540,734,057 / 78

    – OVERCOMER
    Sony / AFFIRM Films

    672 $110,000

    +52.1% / $164
    $33,610,991 / 43

    – LUCY IN THE SKY
    Fox Searchlight

    37 $19,000

    — / $514
    $19,000 / 1

  55. Christian says:

    Just to be clear, MM, I’m almost entirely in sympathy with your streaming skepticism; the change, if it’s to take place, is only just starting in my world, with a new TV that streams much more pleasingly than any of our laptops do. I’m a hard-media guy in general – love my Blu-rays and even the occasional laserdisc.

    Wow, that “Lucy in the Sky” opening really is a wipeout. I hadn’t noticed that until you pointed it out. Yikes!

  56. Stella's Boy says:

    Since it’s poor TIFF reception I haven’t seen or read anything about Lucy save for a Noah Hawley interview where he talks about the bad reviews. It was basically dumped right?

  57. palmtree says:

    Amblin, your take on Joker was superb. But I disagreed with this:

    “Scorsese is mostly right. Marvel movies aren’t really movies. There are exceptions but most are shot and play like “special event” TV episodes.”

    Scorsese didn’t say Marvel was making TV episodes, which if he did would have been a passable commentary on narrative form. But instead he said Marvel movies were theme parks and said Marvel movies don’t convey human emotional or psychological content. Come on, that’s downright offensive and ignorant, even if you don’t care for Marvel movies.

  58. Amblinman says:

    @Palm: I agree that Scorsese is being a snob but I tend to agree with him. I’ve seen every Marvel movie. Most are total flotsom. Most aren’t that exciting from a filmmaking standpoint. I bet if he was asked about, say, Lethal Weapon movies, he’d have a similar take.

    I’ve made this argument before: the problem inherent with Marvel’s films is that since there is so much money at stake, they cannot take risk. Thus the movies are usually just okay. Exciting filmmaking needs risk. This is also why movies bomb – poor choices. Marvel has found a formula that allows minimal creative risks. Financially, god bless. From the viewpoint of a human who likes watching big budget genre stuff…I’d like a little more volatility.

  59. movieman says:

    I remember suggesting a while back that Searchlight should have held “Lucy” until 2020–a late February slot like Portman’s “Annihilation” in 2018 perhaps?
    The unexpectedly tepid Toronto reviews might have been forgotten by then, and it would had a bit more distance between itself and (fellow Fox astronaut movie) “Ad Astra.”

    Have a hard time believing any movie w/ Portman, Hamm and Zazie Beetz could be as bad as some have opined.
    Just sayin’.
    I’d see it today if it was playing anywhere near me–which of course it isn’t (and likely never will).
    And yeah, sure looks like a dump to me, SB.

    Count me in as a fellow hard-media dinosaur, Christian.
    Maybe I’d feel differently if I could afford the high-ticket, high-tech gizmos that make all-streaming households not only possible, but (apparently) desirable.

  60. Christian says:

    MM: Not to belabor this, but as a fellow “cheapskate,” I was shocked to discover the Roku 49-inch TV for just $199 (!!) on Prime Day. And even more shocked to realize that was a discount off the regular price of – are you ready for this? – $249!

    At the time, I’d just written a short item for a magazine I edited that recapped an article about the shockingly low price of smart TVs. Why? Because the manufacturer wants your data, which is worth a lot more than the set itself. So the set is a loss leader of sorts.

    That’s creepy, of course. I don’t like the idea of having my every viewing choice transmitted to the highest bidder, or whomever. But my wife and I rationalized the decision by mutually agreeing that we watch very little TV programming, and that our movies are mostly Blu-rays … so I don’t think there’s not THAT much info Roku is getting from us, beyond our Amazon Prime streaming, which has admittedly ticked up since the TV purchase.

    But if we’re patsies for Big Tech, we’re patsies. So be it. We hadn’t bought a TV set in 19 years of marriage, having used the set I brought into our home after we wed, then an HDTV we inherited from my brother and his wife when they upgraded. It was time for us to buy something. Something very cheap. We’ve been quite happy with the purchase.

  61. movieman says:

    You convinced me, Christian.
    I plan to hit Best Buy the day after Thanksgiving to buy the cheapest smart TV I can get my hands on, lol.
    It’ll probably cost me more to have the cable company hook it up than it will for the actual set, lol.

    Just watched “Donnybrook.”
    The reviews weren’t great, but the cast (Margaret Qualley, James Badge Dale, Jamie Bell, Frank Grillo) was so good I decided to give it a try.
    Loathed it for the first half, but eventually it got under my skin.
    It’s kind of a redneck “Fight Club” (minus the metaphysical mumbo-jumbo that prevents me from loving it the way I do so many David Fincher movies) with a point to make (albeit a fairly hackneyed one) about Trump’s America.
    You can do worse.

  62. Stella's Boy says:

    Wow that’s a great cast. I never even heard of that movie. Sounds interesting. Speaking of something about Trump’s America, anyone see or hear anything about Cuck? Also sounds intriguing. Both appeal to me more than Joker.

  63. movieman says:

    It’s an IFC release from earlier this year, SB.
    Pretty sure it was VOD D&D with “limited theatrical.”
    I know that it opened at NYC’s IFC Center, but can’t tell you how many other screens it actually played on.
    No unsung masterpiece by any stretch, but definitely an interesting watch.
    And I appreciated that Grillo’s Big Bad character is allowed to adhere to his utter nihilism until the bitter end.
    (“Bitter” being the operative word.)

    The “c” word movie you referenced does sound interesting. (Spellcheck insists that I really want to type “Duck,” so I gave up, lol.)
    Seems to be splitting critics into “love it” or “hate it” camps, and that always gets my attention.

    Re: “Joker.”
    I loved the period flavor, but could someone explain to me how Arthur could have had a VHS recorder/videocassetes in his hovel of an apartment in–I’m guessing by the double feature of “Blow Out” and “Zorro the Gay
    Blade”–1981?
    Having lived through that era, I can still recall what a major expenditure it was for my middle-class household when I bought my first video recorder in late ’83.
    Also, I sincerely doubt whether the Wall Street frat boys would have (a) ever ridden a subway; and (b) been familiar enough with the Stephen Sondheim songbook to do an impromptu a cappella rendition of “Send in the Clowns” while fending off a lunatic on a subway car.
    Of course, I’m always a stickler for s**t like that.

  64. Stella's Boy says:

    Totally missed that one for some reason but I am down for that cast and it sounds worth a watch.

  65. Dr Wally Rises says:

    Scorsese’s comments on Marvel are balanced and fair (and I like the MCU pics for the most part), and the overreaction needs to be tempered a little bit. It’s worth noting that Scorsese has praised popular cinema fulsomely in the past (he once said that the cutting technique of ‘Jurassic Park’ should be taught in school, and speaks highly of George Lucas, James Cameron and Christopher Nolan). He’s a lover of movies of all kinds, but just doesn’t respond to the Marvel Empire. Fair enough.

  66. Barry says:

    “Also, I sincerely doubt whether the Wall Street frat boys would have (a) ever ridden a subway”

    Yup, they absolutely would have. Everyone takes (or at least used to) the subway in NYC. Rich, poor, middle, etc. Especially back then. It was the best, quickest way everywhere. You saw all walks of life.

    Signed,

    Ex-Brooklyn boy who had to commute into the city for years.

  67. leahnz says:

    not sure snobbery is the case re the scorsese hullabaloo (for which the timing couldn’t be more hilarious), he’s shown he’s not averse to genre pop cinema over the years done well so i wonder if it’s something more basic related to suspension of disbelief. an overwhelming percentage of what’s on screen in an OTT marvel GCI shitshow looks fake (because it is), suspension of disbelief as a cornerstone of cinema having been abandoned in the case of OTT superhero vis effects to a large extent.
    suspension of disbelief is a complex psychological effect, one of the great and essential tricks of storytelling; if the imagery in a film doesn’t compel you to think/feel that there are real stakes, peril and consequences for the characters, the stakes are low and thus investment in the characters experiences, interior lives and interactions is low, it feels inconsequential and hollow (boy do i relate to this). i think particularly younger generations have become inured to this GCI overload effect, it’s ‘entertainment’ — but to an old school old timer like scorsese this translates to the theme park analogy, a dumb, fun ride.
    (i’d be interested in a more detailed explanation from him as an artist in this regard, what specifically was his experience that made him give up on the genre as worthwhile cinema, but nobody ever seems to ask the stuff i’d get into)

  68. movieman says:

    OK, Barry.
    I was conflating them w/ WS high-rollers like Gordon Gekko.
    If they were young and hungry and not yet established as power players, maybe they would have taken the subway to save a few bucks.

    But knowing the lyrics to “Send in the Clowns”?
    That’s a bridge too far, lol.

  69. movieman says:

    Weekend Box Office October 4-6, 2019

    1 N Joker (2019) WB $93,500,000 – 4,374 – $21,376 $93,500,000 – 1

    2 1 Abominable Uni. $12,000,000 -41.8% 4,248 +6 $2,825 $37,833,115 $75 2

    3 2 Downton Abbey Focus $8,000,000 -44.2% 3,548 +158 $2,255 $73,626,935 – 3

    4 3 Hustlers STX $6,300,000 -44.7% 3,030 -478 $2,079 $91,321,880 $20 4

    5 4 It: Chapter Two WB (NL) $5,355,000 -47.7% 3,163 -448 $1,693 $202,205,157 – 5

    6 5 Ad Astra Fox $4,557,000 -54.5% 2,910 -550 $1,566 $43,662,768 – 3

    7 7 Judy RAtt. $4,445,635 +52.4% 1,458 +997 $3,049 $8,904,078 – 2

    8 6 Rambo: Last Blood LGF $3,550,000 -58.7% 2,900 -718 $1,224 $39,823,895 $50 3

    9 N War (2019) Yash $1,581,000 – 305 – $5,184 $2,088,290 – 1

    10 8 Good Boys Uni. $900,000 -56.5% 1,006 -497 $895 $82,042,620 $20 8

  70. palmtree says:

    Wally and Leah, I’ve got no problem with people criticizing Marvel over the shallowness of the storytelling or suspension of disbelief. Hell, you could even say you hate these movies. Fine, no prob.

    But Scorsese actually claims Marvel “isn’t the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being.” That’s not even factually correct given that the first half of Endgame was devoted to the emotional fall-out of an event and featured almost no theme park thrills. And Endgame isn’t even the most emotional Marvel movie for me. They all have a degree of emotional truth, and you could say it’s based on a formula, but still, it’s there.

    The very reason the public loves Marvel movies is because they connect to the characters emotionally and psychologically. Whether the movies are good is another discussion and a valid one, but I think Scorsese is just yelling at kids on his lawn. Praising Jurassic Park, directed by one of his best friends Steven Spielberg, doesn’t really convince me otherwise.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

palmtree on: BYOFall

Stella's Boy on: BYO Post-JOKER

Geoff on: BYO Post-JOKER

movieman on: BYO Post-JOKER

Pete B. on: BYO Post-JOKER

movieman on: BYOFall

movieman on: BYOFall

leahnz on: BYOFall

Barry on: BYOFall

Dr Wally Rises on: BYOFall

Quote Unquotesee all »

“Well, actually, of that whole group that I call the post-60s anti-authority auteurs, a lot of them came from television. Peckinpah’s the only one whose television work represents his feature work. I mean, like the only one. Mark Rydell can direct a really good episode of ‘Gunsmoke’ and Michael Ritchie can direct a really good episode of ‘The Big Valley,’ but they don’t necessarily look like The Candidate. But Peckinpah’s stuff, even the scripts he wrote that he didn’t even direct, have a Peckinpah feel – the way I think there’s a Corbucci West – suggest a Peckinpah West. That even in his random episodes that he wrote for ‘Gunsmoke’ – it’s right there.”
~ Quentin Tarantino

“The thought is interrupted by an odd interlude. We are speaking in the side room of Casita, a swish and fairly busy Italian bistro in Aoyama – a district of Tokyo usually so replete with celebrities that they spark minimal fuss. Kojima’s fame, however, exceeds normal limits and adoring staff have worked out who their guest is. He stops mid-sentence and points up towards the speakers, delighted. The soft jazz that had been playing discreetly across the restaurant’s dark, hardwood interior has suddenly been replaced with the theme music from some of Kojima’s hit games. Harry Gregson-Williams’ music is sublime in its context but ‘Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots’ is not, Kojima acknowledges, terribly restauranty. He pauses, adjusting a pair of large, blue-framed glasses of his own design, and returns to the way in which games have not only influenced films, but have also changed the way in which people watch them. “There are stories being told [in cinema] that my generation may find surprising but which the gamer generation doesn’t find weird at all,” he says.
~ Hideo Kojima